A number of Hope mathematics students typically
do mathematics research in the summer here at Hope College. Last
summer was no exception. I our colloquium tomorrow, three
students will present their research findings.
Martha Precup and Dan Emmendorfer worked with Prof. Aaron Cinzori to
study piecewise linear spirals. Their research categorized all
geometric sprials and their qualities. Using these
characteristics, they were able to divine an analytic expression for
the
length of these spirals.
Brett Jager worked with Prof. Tim Pennings and Prof. Tom Bultman on a
mathematical biology project. Brett looked at the relationship
between wasps parasitizing on army worms as they feed on grass infected
with a fungus as well as those that are unaffected with a fungus.
The students will not only present their research findings, but will
also answer questions over what it is like to do summer research at
Hope College. If you are interested in doing research this summer
or next, this is a "must attend" colloquium!
- What I did on my summer
vacation (part 2)
- Dan Lithio and Megan Patnott
- Thursday, November 9 at 4:00 pm
- VZN 240
In a continuation of this week's
colloquium, next week two more students will give results of their
research experiences from this past summer. Dan Lithio will
present "The Dynamics of a Volleyball Serve." Dan worked with
Prof. Tim Pennings to model the serve of a volleyball in order to find
the serve that would give the receiving team the minimal time to react.
Megan Patnott will present "Graph Pebbling," based on work done with
Prof. Airat Bekmetjev. She will describe the game where pebbles
are placed on vertices of a connected graph and moved according to
specific rules. She will also discuss when a pebble can be moved
to any vertex under different configurations of pebbles.
As with this week's colloquium, Dan and Megan will also be available to
discuss what it is like to do research at Hope College during the
summer.
Join
us for Tea Time on Thursdays before colloquia
As part of our colloquium series this
year, the mathematics department
will host a "tea time" in the Reading Room (VWF 222) at 3:45 pm.
If tea isn't really your cup of tea, have no fear -- we'll provide some
other beverages and snacks, too. So please join us for a little
food and fellowship before you go to the colloquia. It'll be a
great time to chat with the speaker, your professors and other
students.
Recent
Events at Hope 
MUMC
On
Saturday, October
21,
Hope hosted the 9th annual Michigan Undergraduate Mathematics
Conference (MUMC). Students from across Michigan presented their
research. Professor Bob Devaney from Boston University delivered
the
keynote address, entitled The Fractal Geometry of the
Mandelbrot Set."
The Hope students' talks were: "Spiraling out of Control," by juniors
Dan Emmendorfer and Martha Precup, based on work done with Dr. Aaron
Cinzori; "The Dynamics of a Volleyball Serve," by sophomore Dan Lithio
based on work with Dr. Tim Pennings; "Mathematical Modeling of a
Grass-Army Worm-Wasp Ecosystem," by senior Brett Jager, based on work
with Pennings and Dr. Tom Bultman; and "Graph Pebbling" by senior Megan
Patnott, based on work done with Dr. Airat Bekmetjev.
The conference concluded with the game Induction
Seduction. Eight teams of students
competed to determine the rule that was behind a
sequence of numbers. Different sequences
were determined
acceptable or not acceptable until a rule was finally discovered.
All students competing received some great
prizes that were donated by sponsors of the
conference
|

Megan Patnott, Dan Emmendorfer, and
Sarah Dix cast their vote while playing Induction Seduction.
|

Dan Lithio describes how to model the
flight of a volleyball serve.
|
This past Saturday morning at 9:30 a.m.
eleven Hope College students gathered in VanderWerf Hall to participate
in the thirteenth annual Michigan Autumn Take Home Challenge. Fortified
by donuts, the students worked in teams of two or three for three hours
to solve ten challenging mathematics problems. Their solutions were
sent off to be judged in competition with those of students from 23
different colleges in the Midwest.
The Hope College participants were Jackie Lewis, Samantha Dunmire,
Brian McLellan, Christopher Hall, Josh Kinder, Kimberly Klask, Mandy
Ferguson, Jeffrey Meyers, Dan Lithio, Forrest Gordon, and Martha Precup.
After the competition, the students gathered with faculty advisor
Aaron Cinzori for lunch at 84 East. Results of the competition will be
available in a few weeks.
Here's a sample problem from the competition: The three points
(4,14,8,14), (6,6,10,8), and (2,4,6,8) are vertices of a 4-dimensional
cube in 4-space. Find the center of the cube.
Book Sale!
There
is currently a mathematics book sale going on in the Reading Room (VWF
222).
The books are located in boxes by the
windows. The cost of each book is just 50 cents.
You may pay for books in the main office.
Problem
Solvers of the
Fortnight 
Jeffrey Meyers, Rachel Hashimoto, Laura Smallegan, Jill Immink and the
Anonymous Mathematician with no class all flexed their algebra muscles
to crack the last Problem of the Fortnight. Congratulations on a
job well done! The question was:
What
is the product of the real roots of the equation x2 +
18x + 30 = 2 (x2 + 18x + 45)1/2 ?
Laura and Jill provided
an insightful solution, which we'll paraphrase here: Let u = (x2 + 18x + 45)1/2 so that the
equation becomes u2
- 15 = 2u, which of course can
be rearranged to u2
- 2u - 15 = (u -5)(u + 3) = 0, in which case it's easy
to see that u = 5 or u = -3. Since u = (x2 + 18x + 45)1/2 is the
positive square root, we can disregard the solution u = -3. Hence u = 5 = (x2 + 18x + 45)1/2 and
squaring both sides gives x2
+ 18x + 20 = 0. The
solutions to this equation can be obtained from the quadratic formula,
of course, but since the question asked for the product of the roots, a
more revealing approach is available. Factor the expression as
follows: x2 + 18x + 20 = (x - a)(x
- b) = x2 - (a+b)x + ab. Then the roots are
clearly a and b, and the product ab = 20 can be read directly from
the expression. Thus, the product of the real roots of the
equation is 20 (and the sum of the roots is -18).
Sadly we received no
World Series tickets. Had the editors of Off on a Tangent been in attendance
to cheer on the Tigers, the Tigers just might have won game one!
Dear Friends,
Dear Elvis,
How many zeros are at the end of the whole number that is the product
of the first 300 positive integers?
Al
Dear Al,
Another way to phrase your question is how many consecutive zeros are
at the end of 300!. We have Maple available to us on campus and
it can find the value of 300! quite easily. When I typed this in
the answer was the following.
3060575122164406360353704612972686293885888041735769994167767412594765331
7671686746551529142247757334993914788870172636886426390775900315422684292
7906974559841225476930271954604008012215776252176854255965356903506788725
2643218962642993652045764488303889097539434896254360532259807765212708224
3763944912012867867536830571229368194364995646049816645022771650018517654
6469340112226034729724066333258583506870150169794168850353752137554910289
1264071571548302822849379526365801452352331569364822334367992545940952768
2060806223281238738388081704960000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000
As you can see, there are 74 zeros at the end of this number.
You can also do this quite easily without Maple. To get a zero at
the end of a number, it must have a factor of 10. Since 10s are
made up of factors of 2 and 5 and we know there are lots and lots of
factors of 2 in 300! we need only count the number of factors of
5. Since 300/5 = 60, there are 60 numbers that contain at least
one factor of 5. Since 300/25 = 12, there are 12 numbers that
have at least two factors of 5. Since 300/125 = 2.4, there are 2
numbers that have three factors of 5. Adding these up, we get 60
+ 12 + 2 = 74. This means there are 74 factors of 5 contained in
300! and hence there will be 74 consecutive zeros at the end of 300!.
Dear Elvis,
I hear that some mathematicians are still trying to discover whether
or not there's any repeating pattern in the infinite decimal of pi.
I've a few questions in this connection: first, is it true that in 1768
Johann Lambert proved that there cannot be a repeating pattern in pi?
And if such a thing was indeed proven, why are there folks still trying
to find a pattern? Finally, does it matter whether there's a pattern?
That is, what difference would it make in the world of mathematics, and
in the wider world?
Thanks for any insight you can offer, and please know that I always
appreciate your dogged pursuit of the truth.
Best wishes,
Danny Hoffman
Dear Danny,
Yes, Johann Lambert was the first to prove that pi is an irrational
number and hence cannot have a repeating pattern of digits. That
has not, however, stopped people from trying to find some sort of
pattern. Since pi is irrational, they know that they are not
looking for a repeating pattern of digits, but there might be some more
complex pattern among clusters of digits flopping around after the
decimal place. Some might view their
search as irrational, but then the world is full of people devoted to
crazy notions -- or at least what you and I would call crazy
notions!
Life is like that, though. When some people say that something
cannot be done, that just makes some people want to try to do it all
the more.
Things like running a four-minute mile or climbing to the top of Mt.
Everest were once thought impossible to do. Now even humans
regularly do these things. Would it matter if there were a
pattern in pi? Well, would it matter if Sir Edmund Hillary had
never climbed Mt. Everest? In some sense, probably not. Mt.
Everest would not have changed if Sir Hillary had not scaled it; but
people's perceptions of the great mountain changed once he
did. It was no longer crazy to attempt to climb it.
If you or someone else were to find a pattern in the digits of pi, it
wouldn't change the number -- only our perception of it. The
search for a pattern in pi might be a Sisyphean task, but some people
are obsessed with such things.
Pattern or not, that crazy number pi will always be irrational, thanks
to Lambert's proof. Keep up your own dogged pursuit of the
truth (rational and/or otherwise), Danny!